The wordsmith industry is dauntingly exclusive. I recently coined a term: “Quaternary Source”. A quaternary source is a tertiary source created via a wiki. The prime example of a quaternary source is wikipedia. It is a good starting off point, but the information is not always accurate. Thus it is a step below an encyclopedia or dictionary written by a team of fancy-pants scholars. My phrase was rejected by the very forum that I was attempting to define. Apparently, I am not allowed to coin terms, not having a writer’s license, being unpublishable. If I were publishable, I would make up as many words as I could. That is a hopeless dream now. Without a reliable source, wikipedia contributors have deleted my entry for “Quaternary Sources”, refusing to accept the citation of this blog. This is what was posted on my talk page: Oh, fate why must you be so cruel! ...
From within a postmodern dystopia that is doomed to extinction, we go behind the scenes to bring you the REAL conspiracy, including fresh tips for time travelers.